Recently active topics

I’d like to rapidscan a bunch of chromebooks and mark them Active and move them to a new location at the same time.  But it doesn’t seem to be an option.  Looks like one bulk action at a time.  Is that correct?

I would like to create a rule that when a user is disabled (their role is removed) their assigned Chromebook is disabled. Is this possible?

Sometimes when creating a ticket with many actions, users/techs will be bombarded with every action as an email. Are there way to limit this (create summaries, collection ‘x’ amount of notifications before sending them as one, etc..? -Marcus

Our team has noticed in past few months that our ticket pages are no longer loading every ticket item that we have set to display. For example, when choosing 50, 100, or 200 items per page. It only loads the first 10 or so that you’re actually able to see on your screen. In order to get the rest you have to completely scroll down until you’ve reached your specified number. In the past these would all load when the page loaded, making it easier to navigate and search tickets on that page.  I reached out to support and was told it was working as intended. I stated that it worked in the past and asked why we would have the option to choose how many items per page we wanted if it didn’t actually load them all? To me that is not working as intended.. They escalated the issue. After the escalation I was again told it was working as intended and to submit a feature enhancement request through this idea exchange.  I’ve attached a screenshot below of what happens as you scroll down to load the

Dark Mode would be a great addition. I’ve seen this was suggested before, but wanted to reopen this discussion as I see it has not been implemented. We here at TD3 just joined into the program and would all greatly benefit from a dark mode being available please! Personally I deal with a bad eye strain issue, being far-sighted. Thank you for considering this option, it would be very appreciated!

We are struggling with trying to find a way to create a ticket, using a ticket template, based on a user rule.  We can get all actions to work except “Create Ticket”The use case is if we have a user go to “No Access” that still has a device assigned we would like to create a ticket.We would also like to use this to trigger a ticket when we update a user to indicate they are leaving the district and we need to collect assigned devices. The user rules have the option to create a ticket but we have not been able to get it to work.

Issue:Trying to find devices, that are assigned to students, that have an open ticket.Current Method:Ticket filter: “Has Asset Attached” and State = “Open”, export that list and add the Tags to an Asset view with the Role = Student filter.Solution:Asset filter of “Asset Attached to Open Ticket”.Our current process, regarding broken student devices, is to check the device in, create a ticket, issue a new device, and then repair the broken one. I am trying to identify when this process isn’t followed as, currently, we don’t have a process to catch/correct them.

Goal: To allow our accounting department to only have access to tickets with fees without letting them access other non-fee tickets.  Also to not change any visibility for our other agents. Would this work?  If I created an accounting team with a permission policy that does not have any ticket permissions checked.  Then created a rule that once a ticket is updated with the amount applied filter set to greater than zero it will perform the action of assigning the ticket to the accounting team.  Would this allow accounting team members to view only the tickets assigned to them without accessing any other tickets?

For those of you using fee tracker, how do parents pay fees? I notice it doesn’t email them a payment button like Vanco does. 

I created a custom field in for a group of assets and gave it field type as number. Did import on those assest with new custom field. Didn’t like the format (OCD). Attempted to edit the custom field itself, but could not change field type. Ended up deleting custom field and then adding again with field type as text. Did import and now I have two of the same fields. (see image) When I hover over the lock icon, it states that it is deleted and can no longer be updated. If it is deleted then why is it still even showing? Please advise.  

We have a team of Project Coordinators who frequently upload important documents related to the project lifecycle into work tickets. Currently, the only option is to attach these files in the comments section. Over time, this pushes documents farther down the ticket, making it difficult to locate them later without scrolling through multiple comments.Is there any way to:Upload files into a single, dedicated area of the ticket (for example, below the Info section or somewhere on the right-hand side)? Keep all documents organized in one place rather than spread throughout the comment thread?I understand this might be a minor feature request, but having a centralized document area would improve efficiency for our team. Any advice, workarounds related to this would be appreciated!

Hello!I would like to allow all of my teachers to submit Staff Device repair tickets using a single Ticket Template.However, when I do that, it means I need to select a single Location and a single Model to submit the ticket under.I have created a “Dummy Model” which can be selected at time of ticket creation called “Staff Device” and given it the issue type “Needs Service” which is just a Description field.Given that we store device associations, building associations and more within IIQ, IIQ already has all of the information required to get the ticket in the correct state, without asking the user submitting the ticket to enter anything:Location of user will be their assigned Location in IIQ, fed from Google SSO Asset Tag of device is the main computer/device assigned to the teacher Model of device can be assumed from Asset TagAt this point, truly all I require from the user is a description of the problem.  I am not concerned at this time with having unique issue types per model. Is

Just a question.  We are still having a vast majority of our tickets submitted through email.  I would like our district to really push the submissions through IIQ for obvious reasons.  Who has done this and what were some of the issues.  I still would want the option to send a ticket using email but I want that to be the last option for the user.  What worked for those who switched and what were some best practicesThank you

Our district currently has to use AWS to handle the redirect from our CNAME to our Incident IQ instance. IIQ support has told us they are unable to manage this on their end. Has anyone else run into this? For most of our other vendors, they handle both the redirect and certificate generation, so I wanted to confirm whether this limitation is expected.

I am trying to create an asset view that shows me if the asset passed or failed it’s verification.  We have 10 + tech’s that verify and need to see what assets are failing.  Is there a column that we can see this information?  Thanks.

Hello all, I have rules setup for several things, but I’m curious what Rules you have created that are really helpful? I think iIQ has the ability to do more than what I am doing. We are a School District if that makes a difference in your rules.   Happy day to all!

Hi all, I am hoping for a way to sync device status from IIQ to Mosyle so we know when a device has been damaged or replaced. As Mosyle doesn’t have an inbuilt “Device status” attribute and IIQ supports syncing back tags, I was hoping to just sync IIQ’s status to Mosyle as a device tag; unfortunately, device status isn’t an option to sync as a tag. Is it possible to add “Device status” as an option to sync to Mosyle as a tag? Seems like a pretty straitghtforward request. Thanks! - Jack

I have to change the way my default campus is sorted every time I view my campus. Is there a way to change the default view for how they are sorted on my dashboard. 

I have a ticket that had a spare attached to it.  I checked in the spare, but the ticket is saying that the spare is still checked out.  I even tried re-checking out the spare and turning it back and it and that did nothing but make a duplicate record.  Any help would be much appreciated because I cannot close the ticket until the spare is returned.  I even tried closing the ticket as a duplicate and it said that the spare had to be returned before the ticket can be closed.  

When using IIQ webhooks via HTTP POST or GET method via URL, which IP addressed I need to whitelist on our firewall in order to allow those requests to be delivered into our processing server?

Two custom fields in a ticket are now requiring to be filled in, but they are not marked as being required and they do not need to be required. When I go to edit the custom field, everything looks set correctly for it to not be required. Was wondering if there is somewhere else I should be looking or if I overlooked something?

Under the Asset page there is a section with the heading Meta Information and a required notes comments field. I want to make it not required but not sure where to do that.