Recently active topics

Is there a way to force a ticket to start/get assigned to an agent if we put a comment in a ticket? I thought this was happening in my previous district, but it’s equally likely I was just in the habit of hitting “start” every single time.

We have a team set up called “Assistive Technology” which allows a couple specific non-IT staff members to handle tickets related to IEP/SPED devices within IIQ, when tickets are assigned to the team. These users are assigned the staff role, not agent, because otherwise they’d be able to see/work all tickets in IIQ rather than just tickets assigned to the team. We’re seeing a few issues with using the delegated team permissions:Team members cannot see or create internal comments/comments not visible to requestor Team members don’t have the option to change the ticket’s status to “Waiting on requestor” when creating a comment Team members aren’t seeing all the ticket timeline itemsSee the below images for a comparison of what I see as an agent vs. what the 2 staff users see as a delegated team member to the ticket.  Here’s an image of our site options for delegated ticket permissions: 

I’m trying to upload a logo to our iiQ for emails and login page, but it will not let us to move or properly center the bounding box to display our logo correctly. We have noticed the size constraints and have done the absolutele minimum size, but it still cuts off part of the image even at 100x100 pixels.  Is this a broken part of the website or am I just picking the wrong size for our image?

Basically the problem we have in our district is that devices going missing happens often, but it can be a short-lived occurrence. Our librarians are very good at setting the asset status to “Missing”, which triggers a device lock, but they tend not to create tickets because the devices are often found within hours or even minutes of being locked therefore they don’t want to deal with ticket hassle.The problem this presents to us is we don’t have a good recorded history of how often any given student loses a device, which can be detrimental when discipline/remediation is required. I feel automating lost device ticket creation would be a win-win, librarians don’t have to do the extra work, but we’d still have a trail of who is losing what to support admins when needed. IIQ’s asset rules currently don’t allow for ticket creation based on device status for some reason. So I’m just wondering if anyone has found a workaround to this shortcoming, or what’s your approach. Thank you!    

Currently with all of our repair parts I have been adding their shelf location and ID to the desctiption (ex: Keyboards on Rack A>Shelf 1) but I would like to be able to assign them a home. I have seen where this can be done with assets but is this possible with parts as well?

We are currently swapping out new Chromebooks into our elementary carts and wondering if there is a way to scan all 18 and edit the custom room field on all 18 at once. I.e change the room field to Cart- Room# 135. Or do I have to scan and edit each individually. Also if I can do that can I also bulk add text to say the PO# field? We are trying to find a way to filter and find them all at the end of a 4 year lease. Thanks in advance! - Dusty 

Currently - our agents work tickets and use a resolution action called “Escalate to SysAdmin” to assign the ticket to our SysAdmin team for review. The team would like some baseline information gathered FIRST before accepting the ticket. Here is the template:User: [Teacher Name / Username]Hostname: [e.g., FCS-SerialNumber]MAC Address: [00:00:00:00:00:00]IP Address: [10.xx.xx.xx]Attachments: [Screenshot of Error] & [Screen Recording of Glitch]I do not see a way to “require” the template to be filled out prior to performing a resolution action such as “escalate to SysAdmin team” Please add this feature and we have several teams that would like the information gathered FIRST prior to escalation.

So we have 2 sets of 30 iPads.   They are in Shared iPad mode, and are not owned by anyone.   I have some various asset views that are looking for devices without an owner, because I would ultimately like for *most* things to either have an owner assigned, or to be somehow configured as a fixed “room asset” How would you configure these things so that they don’t show up in some of those Asset Views that I have.  As an FYI, we have JAMF School, and have done the integration into iIQ as well.   Thanks in advance. 

I am sorry to have to put this here but the ability to submit a support ticket in our platform has disappeared.  There is no little icon in the lower right to open a support ticket.   Also out ticket templates that are set to run on a schedule have not run in over a week.  Looking through my list of templates they all have the next run date as a date in the past like the example attached to this post.  Is there a way support can reach out to me to look into this.  I did not know if there was a support email I could use.  

We are having an issue relating around the automation from site options for asset automation. We are using 3 of the 4 options available, When User is assigned asset, update asset to match owner location and owner’s room. We are also using When User location changes, update asset to match owner location.The combination of those 3 solves most of our issues when staff/students move around, but it does present us with a large issue that I am hoping to address and get fixed. We have a process where some students are given an obsolete Chromebook after X years of use/district enrollment. Those Chromebooks are processed for surplus and removed from our District inventory, but they remain in IIQ for tracking who we gave them to. In IIQ they are set to our Surplus location and then retired.The problem we are getting is 8th graders who leave the district with their Chromebook, then return later to our high school and the site options trigger their retired Chromebook to come back into service and

We are in process of getting started using incident IQ. I am having a heck of a time getting the label printing process together. I have a Dymo 450Turbo and I cannot find a nice, durable label to use. Does Incident IQ have a durable laminated label they sell? Thank youKathy 

 I’m having the following where devices are verified but not populating in my custom view. 

We have a rule that sends us emails when a ticket has been responded too. But I like working off of the Ticket View. Is there a way to have some kind of icon to in the ticket views that show that there has been a response to a ticket?This is would be helpful when I look at the tickets “Assigned to Me”. I would like to quickly identify when a ticket requestor has responded. At this moment, I have to look at every ticket.  In the old ticketing system, the ticket subject would show in bold and I would check all tickets that were in bold. Once I responded they would go back  to regular font.This just made it a lot easier to keep up with responses.

Is there a way to hide specific issues under Models? If there is I cannot find it. I can choose to only allow agents to see specific issues on all the other tabs, but not under Models. This causes us to put a lot of stuff under the Other Requests section because there are things we don’t want regular users to see. Being able to edit the issues visibility on Models would be a huge help to us!

Good afternoon, I have been importing Chromebooks with their serial numbers and asset tags into IQ.   I want the Asset Tag to flow from IQ to Google Admin console.    So far it only appears that IQ will update the serial number and the only Asset ID information that will sync to google is the Annotations Asset IT, which I can’t import anything into using the import utility.   Has anyone else ran across this?

Hi All, When I add my co-workers as followers to my tickets, I always click “Yes” on the “Do you want to notify the user that they have been added as a follower?” question before doing so.I have noticed that this does not really notify the user, it rather just starts to send them ticket update information (via email, which is our preferred notification method).Is there a way I can get this to actually notify a person that they were added as a follower (again, via email), and then provide them ticket update information rather than just start receiving ticket updates?

Is there a way I can create tickets with ticket templates via email submission rule?

Summary of IssueWe are encountering an issue where barcode scans intermittently lose the first 1–3 characters when scanning into Incident IQ web search fields (asset search, ticket search, etc.).This behavior occurs across multiple barcode scanner vendors and models when used with Incident IQ only. The issue is not observed in native applications or on other websites.EnvironmentApplication: Incident IQ (web) Browsers affected: Google Chrome Microsoft Edge Browsers not affected: Native Windows applications (e.g., Notepad) Operating System: Windows (managed device) Scanner types tested (with issues): Netum NSL8 (2.4 GHz RF HID, no speed adjustment) Tera 1D scanner (HID, no transmission speed adjustment) Tera 2D scanner (HID, no transmission speed adjustment) Scanner types tested (no issues when configured): Nadamoo scanners with adjustable transmission speed / inter‑key delay Input Method: USB / RF HID keyboard emulation Barcode Types: Standard asset barcodes (1D and 2D)Observed B