Tickets

We have an auto reopen rule that says, if the status is Resolved and Comment is updated within 5 days of the ticket, then it is set to In-Progress.Issue: When a user performs a reaction on an email it automatically re-opens the ticket. I am looking for a solution to avoid that.

Hi Is there a way to add the “Additional Followers” field in the form for events?

I need to change the options that show up when you click “new ticket”. I would like to create a custom category that would go be positioned first. Some of the options are irrelevant for us and only make it more challenging for users. 

Anyone else have issues with printing standard Avery 5160 Labels?  We created a template with exact label dimesions of 1” x 2.625” and it continues to not space correctly vertically or evenly. The labels run off to the next label..  This is very frustrating. It makes the module unusable.  Is there a trick we are missing to make them come out right?

How are you going about being notified of New Tickets other than logging into and living in IIQ all day?We don’t auto assign tickets quite yet, as there are only two of us, and we try to prioritize them and work them as we get them.  I have noticed, that when new tickets are submitted by my users, that neither of us get email notifications.  The only way either of us know about a new ticket is if we look for new tickets in IIQ.I don’t see an option for “Ticket Creation” notifications for Agents in the Site Settings.  What is the best practice here?Thank you all in advance for your help. 

Is there a way to force a ticket to start/get assigned to an agent if we put a comment in a ticket? I thought this was happening in my previous district, but it’s equally likely I was just in the habit of hitting “start” every single time.

Can requesters select a parent asset such as a Chromebook cart during ticket submission and then choose one or more linked child Chromebook assets from that cart, based on room/staff associations?

Hello, We have a third party app that sends a email to IQ support to open a ticket when x happens (like the camera is offline). We would like to turn off all email notifications for that guest accounts so that IQ doesn’t send any emails to that email account. Is that possible.  ThanksRon

I am trying to help some of our tier 1 technicians help track tickets that were waiting on requestor where the requestor has responded. Right now the ticket just shifts back to in progress but sometimes that can create issues where they miss that email/status change. Is anyone out there using any creative rules or other ways to keep better tabs on tickets where requestors have responded already? I tried out using a ticket update rule where it looked for any update on a ticket where if it was Waiting on Requestor it would flag it, but that might cause issues when internal updates/comments are added to tickets by a technician.

Is there a way to export configured issues/resolutions from one model and import them into another one? We have over a hundred different device models and get new ones all the time. I would like to be able to configure one model’s issues and subsequent resolutions, export them and import them into other models so I don’t have to manually add them to each model we have in our system. 

Our agents wanted a rule / status change when a requester replies to a ticket. I created a custom status “Waiting on Agent” with the workflow stage “In Progress”. I created a rule that should trigger when a requester comments, the status changes to ‘Waiting on Agent”.However it seems that I can’t get the role to filter out when an agent comments (however, if they select “waiting on requester” it will change the status). I do the help desk, and assign tickets to other agents. So if I commented, it will say “waiting on agent” (which is not what I wanted for the rule).   Here is the original rule I had:   I made a copy changing the status (only close if required steps) and excluding agents instead)

I wanted to see if there’s a way to schedule daily reports for tickets. I’ve been asked to figure out a way to give my department lead a daily report of our team’s open tickets. I know how to create the report, but I want to know if there’s a way to schedule one to be created daily and emailed. Thanks!

I am working on setting up a Google App Script to help pull data on a schedule into a Sheet (similar to this other community post). In this case though I have two views setup (one for assets and one for tickets). I think I have something that might work but this is well outside my wheelhouse and was wondering if anyone in the community has done this/could check my script.This one is for tickets and I’d just swap the view IDs, module, product ID, and sheet name:function pullTicketsPost() { const API_KEY = 'YOUR_API_KEY'; const VIEW_ID = 'YOUR_TICKET_VIEW_ID'; // The Product ID for the Tickets module const PRODUCT_ID = '88df910c-91aa-e711-80c2-0004ffa00010'; // URL targeting the Tickets module with a high result count to minimize paging const URL = 'https://bisd303.incidentiq.com/api/v1.0/tickets?$s=5000'; // Constructing the payload to filter by the spe

Hi All,I have always been able to see how old a ticket is in terms of days old. However, as of today, I can no longer see the age of a ticket in days. I can see the submitted date, and can do the quick math, but it was nice to be able to see a day count on the tickets instead of reading a list of dates. Does anyone know how to bring this back? I looked at columns for a bit and didn’t see anything that worked.

We’ve noticed that when our agents get email notifications about tickets, new tickets, updates, etc. in the fields showing the updates the text isn’t formatted with line breaks.  Instead it is all put together with text wrapping.  On longer tickets where there are paragraphs in the ticket is just one big wall of text making it all very hard to read.Considering how many things IIQ does great I find it hard to believe that something as simple as properly formatting the emails is something they can’t do.  Are we missing a setting or something that would resolve this?

I am creating a ticket template for multiple locations scheduled for work to be done at the end of the school year.  When that date rolls around is one ticket opened for all locations or a ticket opened for each location?Thanks!

I am new to iiQ and am the Inventory Secretary for our school districts Maintenance Facility.  I enter invoice data information for All purchases our department makes.  (We previously came from School Dude/Asset Essentials) I know how to enter parts inventory but am searching for a way to enter any purchases (not a part) made for a work order ticket to be listed.  Besides just entering into the action notes field is there a way to set custom fields such as Invoice Date, Number, Cost, Vendor and Who Purchased to my ticket progress?  Anyone else have this available to them?

Is there a way to hide the default “description of issue” so users do not fill it in, and instead fill in the one I custom defined?

“Issue found, it was an old approval workflow that allowed them to work tickets and the users inquestion where accidently taking their own tickets.”  I have come across an issue, I have a small number of tickets that users are somehow creating and after they are created, it shows them as the agent and the status of the ticket is changed from submitted to in progress. They currently are all under the staff role.  I have not been able to replicate the issue and cannot find anthing in the timeline or rules that would be causing it to happen.   Does anyone have any thoughts on this? 

Anyone else noticing that emails are not coming from IIQ this afternoon, April 16th?  We have submitted a ticket but just wondering if others are seeing the same thing.  

Hi there! I’m trying to create a new rule in our iiQ stack that will allow for an email to be sent to the ticket submitter or on behalf of after we change the status of a device to decommissioned. So far I have created the rule and tested it but I’m not getting anywhere with success. I have used the AI Chatbot throughouly but am at the point that I am running in circles. Below is a picture of the rule in its current state, any help is much appreciated!! 

We have a team set up called “Assistive Technology” which allows a couple specific non-IT staff members to handle tickets related to IEP/SPED devices within IIQ, when tickets are assigned to the team. These users are assigned the staff role, not agent, because otherwise they’d be able to see/work all tickets in IIQ rather than just tickets assigned to the team. We’re seeing a few issues with using the delegated team permissions:Team members cannot see or create internal comments/comments not visible to requestor Team members don’t have the option to change the ticket’s status to “Waiting on requestor” when creating a comment Team members aren’t seeing all the ticket timeline itemsSee the below images for a comparison of what I see as an agent vs. what the 2 staff users see as a delegated team member to the ticket.

Basically the problem we have in our district is that devices going missing happens often, but it can be a short-lived occurrence. Our librarians are very good at setting the asset status to “Missing”, which triggers a device lock, but they tend not to create tickets because the devices are often found within hours or even minutes of being locked therefore they don’t want to deal with ticket hassle.The problem this presents to us is we don’t have a good recorded history of how often any given student loses a device, which can be detrimental when discipline/remediation is required. I feel automating lost device ticket creation would be a win-win, librarians don’t have to do the extra work, but we’d still have a trail of who is losing what to support admins when needed. IIQ’s asset rules currently don’t allow for ticket creation based on device status for some reason. So I’m just wondering if anyone has found a workaround to this shortcoming, or what’s your approach. Tha

Currently - our agents work tickets and use a resolution action called “Escalate to SysAdmin” to assign the ticket to our SysAdmin team for review. The team would like some baseline information gathered FIRST before accepting the ticket. Here is the template:User: [Teacher Name / Username]Hostname: [e.g., FCS-SerialNumber]MAC Address: [00:00:00:00:00:00]IP Address: [10.xx.xx.xx]Attachments: [Screenshot of Error] & [Screen Recording of Glitch]I do not see a way to “require” the template to be filled out prior to performing a resolution action such as “escalate to SysAdmin team” Please add this feature and we have several teams that would like the information gathered FIRST prior to escalation.

I am sorry to have to put this here but the ability to submit a support ticket in our platform has disappeared.  There is no little icon in the lower right to open a support ticket.   Also out ticket templates that are set to run on a schedule have not run in over a week.  Looking through my list of templates they all have the next run date as a date in the past like the example attached to this post.  Is there a way support can reach out to me to look into this.  I did not know if there was a support email I could use.