Unanswered questions

Hello we are trying to create assets via API. I am able to create the asset but I am having trouble adding our custom field in. Ive tried to pass the custom field when creating the asset initially and I have also tried updating the asset post creation with the field. I had seen another discussion post where they did via the bulk set-info end point. I tried to follow that but it still did not work. Please let me know if I am doing anything wrong.  def set_asset_custom_field(self, asset_id: str, field_id: str, value):payload = {"AssetIds": f"[{asset_id}]","Request": {"Values": [{"Key": f"$assets.custom-field:{field_id}","Value": f"{value}"}]}} response = self.request("POST", "/assets/bulk/set-info", payload)

Problem: Fines for my school are sent out intermittently as physical copies. This requires printing out all of the fines. These copies are distributed by 7th period teacher. I can print all the fines by grade, but there is no filter that considers a specific class period.Request: Can a user view filter be included for users (students) by class period? Consderations: This view would allow me to pull up a view for every student with a 7th period teacher, filtered by that teacher. I could then print out fines grouped by teacher + period. The grouped view would reduce time to accumulate and distribute fine statements. A view for user by period would also allow for statements to be batch generated with the "select all, generate statement" option on the view. Currently, you can view a teacher's class by period, but it does not allow to batch print statements from there.Does anyone know how this can be done?

We are begining our end of year audit process and i have given the staff instructions on how to verify the assets in there room using the incident iq app. well when they went to scan the asset tag it didnt pop up on mobile but they have claimed there room and in the browser version they cn see all there assets assigned to that room. Any ideas why it would work??

Is there a way to run a report to see which users have not yet configured their account recovery questions?  We would like to make it a requirement that all staff set those up so they will have the ability to reset their own password.  It would be nice to see if there is a way to see who has, and who has not yet configured their answers.

Do these just not happen anymore? These used to include a lot of maintenance items and bug fixes in them, but I haven’t seen a post in a couple of months at least. Seems like progress on a lot of things has slowed to a crawl.

I just had some questions about device assignments. When we assign a user to a device would the nightly syncs cause the device to go back to chrome-enroll? My other question is if a user logs in to another students device does that device now assign ownership to the student that borrowed/used the chromebook? 

I’m trying to upload a logo to our iiQ for emails and login page, but it will not let us to move or properly center the bounding box to display our logo correctly. We have noticed the size constraints and have done the absolutele minimum size, but it still cuts off part of the image even at 100x100 pixels.  Is this a broken part of the website or am I just picking the wrong size for our image?

Basically the problem we have in our district is that devices going missing happens often, but it can be a short-lived occurrence. Our librarians are very good at setting the asset status to “Missing”, which triggers a device lock, but they tend not to create tickets because the devices are often found within hours or even minutes of being locked therefore they don’t want to deal with ticket hassle.The problem this presents to us is we don’t have a good recorded history of how often any given student loses a device, which can be detrimental when discipline/remediation is required. I feel automating lost device ticket creation would be a win-win, librarians don’t have to do the extra work, but we’d still have a trail of who is losing what to support admins when needed. IIQ’s asset rules currently don’t allow for ticket creation based on device status for some reason. So I’m just wondering if anyone has found a workaround to this shortcoming, or what’s your approach. Thank you!    

Currently - our agents work tickets and use a resolution action called “Escalate to SysAdmin” to assign the ticket to our SysAdmin team for review. The team would like some baseline information gathered FIRST before accepting the ticket. Here is the template:User: [Teacher Name / Username]Hostname: [e.g., FCS-SerialNumber]MAC Address: [00:00:00:00:00:00]IP Address: [10.xx.xx.xx]Attachments: [Screenshot of Error] & [Screen Recording of Glitch]I do not see a way to “require” the template to be filled out prior to performing a resolution action such as “escalate to SysAdmin team” Please add this feature and we have several teams that would like the information gathered FIRST prior to escalation.

I am sorry to have to put this here but the ability to submit a support ticket in our platform has disappeared.  There is no little icon in the lower right to open a support ticket.   Also out ticket templates that are set to run on a schedule have not run in over a week.  Looking through my list of templates they all have the next run date as a date in the past like the example attached to this post.  Is there a way support can reach out to me to look into this.  I did not know if there was a support email I could use.  

We are having an issue relating around the automation from site options for asset automation. We are using 3 of the 4 options available, When User is assigned asset, update asset to match owner location and owner’s room. We are also using When User location changes, update asset to match owner location.The combination of those 3 solves most of our issues when staff/students move around, but it does present us with a large issue that I am hoping to address and get fixed. We have a process where some students are given an obsolete Chromebook after X years of use/district enrollment. Those Chromebooks are processed for surplus and removed from our District inventory, but they remain in IIQ for tracking who we gave them to. In IIQ they are set to our Surplus location and then retired.The problem we are getting is 8th graders who leave the district with their Chromebook, then return later to our high school and the site options trigger their retired Chromebook to come back into service and