Tickets

I know when we were first setting up our site, we talked about being able to submit a ticket with a form in the initial parent ticket. So if we had a PD request, the user could fill out the form, which then goes straight to our agent to approve/deny the request. Or if someone needed to update their W4 they could just create a ticket and immediately fill out the form, instead of submitting the ticket and then the form being attached once an agent has worked it. Is this still in the works, or did it kinda die out?

when a Ticket got resolved by a technician, it then immediately got assigned to another technician.How do i create a rule to fix that ? 

Anyone else getting this problem? I have views set up for my HR ticket workflow and none of the custom fields for names/EID’s/Locations are loading. Upon checking other views for assets or tickets, only IIQ fields are loading, not custom fields. All these fields below should have information in them, but nothing is populating this morning. 

Has anyone setup ClassLink OneSync API Events and Actions to create ticket of user account action?

I have created Ticket Templates. One of my subtickets (which is a template) has subtasks. When I create the ticket from the template, the subtasks aren’t showing up. This is the Ticket Template I have created for Certificated Staff that are resigning. The Device Subticket - does create a subticket like it should. However, this is what is set up for that template. There are multiple subtasks. However, when the Ticket Template for Resignation - Certificated (1st picture) is used, the subtasks for the Device Check- In are not being created within that ticket. Any ideas?I could create separate subtickets for devices turned in, but would like it to be all under that one ticket

Is it possible to use Rules to update a ticket status based on a follower’s comment? If any follower replies to “Resolve Please”, I want the ticket status to update to Resolved. We may change the trigger words, but I haven’t been able to find a rule filter to scan those follower comments. Is this possible? 

I’ve had an inquiry from our business office to hop onto our system to use for business request to their office. I think this is very doable by creating a separate set of issues and making those employees agents in our system.My concern is that most of our current tech tickets come into the system via email submission. We have a domain address techhelp@ that auto forwards to tickets@ourdomain.incidentiq.com address.I would not want users to email the same address for tech and business office requests. I would want it set up so that if you need tech support, you email techhelp@ and if you need business office support, you email businesshelp@.We can accomplish this by setting both account to forward to tickets@ourdomain.incidentiq.com but I don’t know if the system can decipher the originating message in order to create rules to auto assign emails to businesshelp@ to

I have everything set up so that Students can only see the model of laptop they are assigned when placing a ticket & when they choose it they only see specific issues for that laptop, however, if they choose the “I don’t know the model” option, it shows them all the issues for all the other laptops. These could be assigned to a teacher or central office employee and so the issues are different and I don’t want students to see those. Is there an option to hide that choice or is there another way I can accomplish this? Hopefully that makes sense!

We have a situation where we have students going in and canceling their ticket when it still has a balance outstanding.  Naturally we do not wish them to be able to forgive their own debt, it teaches a bad life lesson. How do we prevent students from being able to cancel their ticket, or a least specific tickets?

We are hoping to use the remote support ticketing app for parents to put in a ticket for a student’s Chromebook while at home over the summer.  We are testing it out and noticed that when the IT tech asks a question through the comments on the ticket, the guest will get an email saying a response is needed but they can not respond to the ticket.  When they click the link to respond in the email, incident IQ requires a username and password or Google SSO.  How can a guest respond to a ticket with the Remote Support Ticketing app?

Backstory - I created a status called “waiting on agent” I want this to be set as the status when a requestor comments on their ticket. This way the agent can see what needs to be addresses. I have a rule that triggers on update when a requestor comments change status to waiting on agent it works for the first reply but after that the rule log says “This rule Change to waiting on agent when requestor replies has already run at …...” Anyway to make it rerun when those conditions are meet   Thank you

Is there a way to create a custom search with a filter allowing you to search for tickets with a specific follower?I work for a large school district and we have staff members with varying levels of computer expertise who are creating tickets for students. We regularly receive tickets where the only information concerning who the ticket is for, is by adding the student as a follower. These tickets are falling through the cracks when we look up the student and don’t see the ticket they created.I understand the need for end-user education on ticket creating, which we have been working on, however, we do see a lot of situations where substitute staff assume the ticket creation role. I would greatly appreciate any advice on how others address issues like this!

Hello, I am wondering if there is a way to move tickets from “Ticketing” and reassign to Facilities or Human Resources module?

Is there a way to add block off days in “Events” to prevent an organization from booking a day.For example we have rooms available for rent M-Fr 2:30-10, however July 4th we are officially closed and no one can rent any room that day.   Is there a way to block off a physical the day from being rented?

We are a K-12 using both the Facilities and Technology product concurrently. From time to time our users incorrectly place a ticket using the facilities entry interface as apposed to the technology interface. Is there a way to switch the ticket over to technology and vice versa without having to delete and re-enter the ticket? Thanks!

I have read https://incidentiq.api-docs.io/1.0.0/tickets/HfTCgXppZMSTyLytaI have been through: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncidentIQI have been dissecting this: https://github.com/GatewaySchoolDistrict/PowerIIQ/blob/main/PowerIIQ.psm1I have postman and python successfully querying for the tickets, but it is either not returning all the tickets assigned or I am not understanding out to return all open tickets assigned to the API user for a particular issueID:  "IssueId": "11c2249a-5a1a-ed11-a1f9-000d3a7e102a" I  want to use this API user and filter issue types for spe

I was wondering if anyone knows of a way to have the asset number for tickets be part of the subject line? Say I’m creating a ticket for a chromebook, I’d like to have the asset tag for that device be part of the subject line “Dell 3100 Chromebook [Asset Tag Here] > Hardware Damage> Cracked Screen” Any suggestions? 

I am wondering if there is a way to have tickets at certain locations assigned automatically to agents. In our district (as well as many others) specific agents handle the tickets for specific locations. Instead of me having to assign those tickets based on location to the same agents everyday I would love to have the ability to have those locations send the tickets to them automatically and have them pass off the ticket if it is not relevant to them.

I’m trying to change the value in the Site Options page for “Sensitive Information Default Value” but no matter what I choose, new tickets have the option checked “yes” and it won’t let me change it. I’ve tried turning the site option to on, off, and not set, but there is always a check next to “Yes” on the ticket creation page. Am I missing something? Site options Ticket creation 

I have a script some of our agents run related to some stuff in Jamf (our mdm) that results in creating a ticket for the user, with their asset attached, and assigned to the agent who runs the script. This part works great. However, occasionally human error happens and the Agent has to run the script a second time resulting in a duplicate ticket.Is there an endpoint in the API that can tell me if a user has open tickets with their ticket ID? Or show me the tickets in a custom view that can get me the ticket ID?  I've found some info about views and tickets but not going so far as to let me inspect an individual ticket that way without already knowing the ticket ID ahead of time.I was thinking I could then either update the ticket that it was ran a second time (if possible) or at least alert the agent that a second ticket was NOT created because the first is still open and provide the number.As a novice shell script writer I am 100% open to the idea it's a

Hello,I Know I can run a rule simulation to see its application on a ticket.  I was wondering if there was a way to query tickets to see how many times the rule has run and those tickets it has been applied too?  Maybe it is there and I am just missing it. Thank you for any help! Mike

The custom views for school sites (under tickets) show all applied settings which only show open tickets. If I select a school site through the dashboard, it shows all resolved tickets instead of just the current open tickets. It just recently changed and I’m not sure why. Is there a way to exclude all resolved tickets when selecting a school site from the dashboard? 

We have staff submit tickets, but we also have a call center in which techs create tickets for users and either resolve the issue or escalate it. I’m trying to come up with an idea for how to differentiate phone call tickets vs submitted tickets.One option would be to use tags and a ticket template. However, my call center techs prefer to search for the user first to see if they already have an open ticket or open the ticket by clicking on the device listed in the users profile.Not every ticket they create on behalf of a user is a phone call either. Anyone have a suggestion?

When we have a crate of devices that need repair delivered to Central Office, the tech would have to, one at a time, look up each device, click the active ticket on that device, and claim it.Is there a good way to allow them to simply scan the tags of the assets and then, in bulk, claim the tickets for those devices?I wanted to make sure this wasn’t a feature somehow before posting an idea.

I have a ticket (#3581) open with IIQ Support, but it seems to have been abandoned as it hasn’t been responded to or had any communication (other than from me) in two weeks. This is a major problem for us and we need to figure out what happened with this ticket, and how to resolve the issue to which the ticket is referring.